qm
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
qm [2025/03/28 12:13] – pklapetek | qm [2025/03/28 13:34] (current) – pklapetek | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Goal of the quantitative mechanics measurement regime is to evaluate local mechanical properties using off-resonance tapping (ORT) technique for feedback and evaluating the individual force-distance curves obtained during this process. | Goal of the quantitative mechanics measurement regime is to evaluate local mechanical properties using off-resonance tapping (ORT) technique for feedback and evaluating the individual force-distance curves obtained during this process. | ||
- | To make it work, a periodic excitation in the range of hundreds of nanometers has to be added to the cantilever motion, which allows the probe to snap in contact, measure a force-distance dependence in the contact, determine the maximum value of force for feedback loop, leave the contact providing an adhesion value and then to repeate | + | To make it work, a periodic excitation in the range of hundreds of nanometers has to be added to the cantilever motion, which allows the probe to snap in contact, measure a force-distance dependence in the contact, determine the maximum value of force for the feedback loop, leave the contact providing an adhesion value and then to repeat |
+ | To use this mode with Gwyscope GUI, first adjust the probe signal the same way as you would do it in the [[contact|contact mode]]. Cross-check in the [[settings|Settings]] (Read and set raw signals dialogue) that a low pass filter is set to some really low frequency, just to remove a mean value from our deflection signal, not to distort it. Then switch to “QM” regime (while still being out of contact). Use " | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | The dialogue shows you a dynamic view on the force-distance curves collected and evaluated. The curves are downsampled to much smaller value than how many data points DSP could provide, so their size is in hundreds of points at maximum. They are shown in time (bottom graph, normalized to show both the shaking piezo and force) and as a force-distance plot (top graph). When you are not in feedback, you will probably see only the sine signal from the piezo and some noise. To see more, | ||
+ | set the key parameters for the measurement regime - for the beginning it is enough to set the frequency and amplitude and to set the evaluation range to cover entire signal. You can set all the rest later. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now you can close this window, set the feedback voltage (having the same meaning as for the contact mode) and start the feedback. When you are in feedback (or if you have troubles in coming into feedback), open the QM settings dialogue again and adjust the parameters to let it work properly: | ||
+ | * Evaluation range: the range where the mechanical properties will be fitted. These should cover some part of the maximum extension of the shaking z-piezo - ideally the part starting right after the maximum force is detected and ending slightly before the cantilever leaves the contact. Note that the end of evaluation range is also the position after which the maximum force, which is used for feedback, will no more be detected - to prevent false impact of ringing after the cantilever leaves the contact. | ||
+ | * Zero line range: the range where the zero line force will be averaged, to be subtracted from adhesion. | ||
+ | * Frequency of the shaking z-piezo, now tested between 500 Hz and 2 kHz. | ||
+ | * Amplitude of the shaking z-piezo in Volts - real physical amplitude depends on your setup. | ||
+ | * Shaking z-piezo offset (useful e.g. when you need a positive voltage only for it) | ||
+ | * Shift between the force and shaker z-piezo signal. The maximum values of the curves should match and this parameter can control it. | ||
+ | * Deflection sensitivity for the cantilever. Note that this parameter significantly affects the shape of the force-distance curve as it is used to convert the probe z-position to probe-sample separation. | ||
+ | * Stiffness of the cantilever. | ||
+ | * Tip radius estimate. | ||
+ | * Sample Poisson' | ||
+ | * Setpoint - the same as in the main control panel, just to allow playing with it here. | ||
+ | The dialogue also shows some of the evaluation results, which can be used to tune the settings. Detected maximum and minimum force is shown in one of the graphs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If all of this seems to work and curves are repeatable, include both the part in the contact and out of the contact, you can close the dialogue and start scanning. If the QM mode is selected, your scan list will automatically include the mechanical response signals, like Modulus, Adhesion, etc. as shown here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here are some troubleshooting tips: | ||
+ | * start from larger shaking z-piezo amplitudes to make sure that probe gets out of contact between individual approaches. If it does, you can decrease the amplitude. | ||
+ | * Start from lower frequencies and larger forces. | ||
+ | * Even if the setpoint is entered in Volts, you can see the force on the graph. | ||
+ | * Cross-check if end of your evaluation limit is enough beyond the maximum position, otherwise you will not find the maximum. Check where the evaluated maxima and minima are on the lower graph. | ||
+ | * Remember that your feedback loop gets only single number per one period, so it is slower than in contact mode. | ||
+ | * To set-up the regime for the first time, use softer cantilever, stiff sample (e.g. any calibration grating) and care only for the feedback and adhesion, not for modulus. | ||
+ | * To get a reasonable modulus result, probe should elastically deform the sample, so stiffer cantilever and higher force will be usually better. When you will operate with these settings on a stiff sample, you might easily destroy the probe apex. | ||
qm.1743160390.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/03/28 12:13 by pklapetek